Abstract

Multiconjugate adaptive optics is one of the major challenges in adaptive optics. It requires the measurement of the volumic distribution of the turbulence. Two wavefront sensing (WFS) concepts have been proposed to perform the wavefront analysis for such systems: the star-oriented and layer-oriented approaches. We give a performance analysis and a comparison of these two concepts in the framework of the simplest of the multi-guide-star adaptive optics systems, that is, ground layer adaptive optics. A phase-related criterion is proposed to assess analytically the performance of both concepts. This study highlights the main advantages and drawbacks of each WFS concept and shows how it is possible to optimize the concepts with respect to the signal to noise ratio on the phase measurement. A comparison of their optimized versions is provided and shows that one can expect very similar performance with the two optimized concepts.

© 2006 Optical Society of America

Laser guide star wavefront sensing for ground-layer adaptive optics on extremely large telescopes

Richard M. Clare, Miska Le Louarn, and Clementine Béchet
Appl. Opt. 50(4) 473-483 (2011)

Optimal reconstruction for closed-loop ground-layer adaptive optics with elongated spots

Clémentine Béchet, Michel Tallon, Isabelle Tallon-Bosc, Éric Thiébaut, Miska Le Louarn, and Richard M. Clare
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 27(11) A1-A8 (2010)

Scintillation and phase anisoplanatism in Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensing

Clélia Robert, Jean-Marc Conan, Vincent Michau, Thierry Fusco, and Nicolas Vedrenne
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23(3) 613-624 (2006)

Optimal wave-front reconstruction strategies for multiconjugate adaptive optics

Thierry Fusco, Jean-Marc Conan, Gérard Rousset, Laurent Marc Mugnier, and Vincent Michau
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 18(10) 2527-2538 (2001)

Experimental results of ground-layer and tomographic wavefront reconstruction from multiple laser guide stars

Michael Lloyd-Hart, Christoph Baranec, N. Mark Milton, Miguel Snyder, Thomas Stalcup, J. Roger, and P. Angel
Opt. Express 14(17) 7541-7551 (2006)