Abstract
Kirchhoff’s theory of diffraction, as usually formulated, leads to an internal mathematical inconsistency because the solution does not reduce to the assumed boundary conditions as the observation point approaches the plane of the diffracting aperture. However, it is in excellent agreement with experiment. We show that two different, consistent formulations of Kirchhoff’s theory [ F. Kottler, Ann. Phys. 70, 405 ( 1923); E. W. Marchand and E. Wolf, J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56, 1712 ( 1966)] are equivalent.
© 1988 Optical Society of America
Full Article | PDF ArticleCorrections
Salvatore Ganci, "Equivalence between two consistent formulations of Kirchhoff’s diffraction theory: erratum," J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5, 2050-2050 (1988)https://opg.optica.org/josaa/abstract.cfm?uri=josaa-5-12-2050
More Like This
Salvatore Ganci
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 5(12) 2050-2050 (1988)
E. W. Marchand and E. Wolf
J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56(12) 1712-1721 (1966)
Yusuf Z. Umul
J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 27(1) 109-115 (2010)